| Court: | ctd |
| Docket #: | 3:11-cv-00879 |
| Case Name: | Judd v. Secretary of State of Connecticut et al |
| PACER case #: | 93327 |
| Date filed: | 2011-05-31 |
| Date terminated: | 2012-03-09 |
| Assigned to: | Judge Mark R. Kravitz |
| Case Cause: | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Nature of Suit: | 441 Civil Rights: Voting |
| Jury Demand: | None |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Represented Party | Attorney & Contact Info |
| Keith Russell Judd Petitioner |
Keith Russell Judd |
| Secretary of State of Connecticut Respondent |
Maura Murphy-Osborne |
| State of Connecticut Respondent |
Maura Murphy-Osborne |
| Date Filed | Document # | Attachment # | Short Description | Long Description | Upload date | SHA1 hash |
| 2011-05-31 | 1 | 0 | COMPLAINT For Declaratory Judgment And Preliminary Injuction re Elections-Voting against State of Connecticut, Secretary of State of Connecticut, filed by Keith Russell Judd.(Malone, P.) (Entered: 06/01/2011) | |||
| 2011-05-31 | 2 | 0 | MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keith Russell Judd. (Malone, P.) (Entered: 06/01/2011) | |||
| 2011-05-31 | 3 | 0 | Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Motions to Dismiss due on 8/31/11. Amended Pleadings due by 7/30/2011; Discovery due by 11/30/2011; Dispositive Motions due by 12/30/2011. Signed by Clerk on 5/31/11. (Malone, P.) (Entered: 06/01/2011) | |||
| 2011-06-08 | 4 | 0 | ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 6/8/2011. (Hatch-Miller, M.) (Entered: 06/08/2011) | |||
| 2011-06-09 | 5 | 0 | ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *State of Connecticut, Secretary of State of Connecticut* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Keith Russell Judd* *#11593-051 FCI* *PO Box 7000* *Texarkana, TX 75505*. (Inferrera, L.) (Entered: 06/09/2011) | |||
| 2011-06-09 | 6 | 0 | USM 285 forms together with Summons and all instructions mailed to IFP plaintiff to complete and return to Clerk's office. (Inferrera, L.) (Inferrera, L.). (Entered: 06/09/2011) | |||
| 2011-06-20 | 7 | 0 | NOTICE of Motion pending before MDL to transfer cases to Western District of Arkansas by Keith Russell Judd (Pesta, J.) (Entered: 06/20/2011) | |||
| 2011-06-20 | 8 | 0 | Memorandum Brief in Support of 1 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment by Keith Russell Judd (Pesta, J.) (Entered: 06/20/2011) | |||
| 2011-07-05 | 9 | 0 | Memorandum Brief in Support re 1 Complaint filed by Keith Russell Judd. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 07/06/2011) | |||
| 2011-07-11 | 10 | 0 | NOTICE of Motion before Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to transfer by Keith Russell Judd (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 07/11/2011) | |||
| 2011-08-08 | 11 | 0 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keith Russell Judd. Secretary of State of Connecticut served on 7/5/2011, answer due 7/26/2011. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 08/09/2011) | |||
| 2011-08-10 | 12 | 0 | NOTICE: According to the record before the Court, Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd filed this action on May 31, 2011. See Compl. 1 . A summons was issued and Defendants Secretary of State of Connecticut and State of Connecticut were served on July 5, 2011. See Summons 11 . The Defendants must file an appearance and answer the complaint no later than September 1, 2011. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 8/10/2011. (Ghilardi, K.) (Entered: 08/10/2011) | |||
| 2011-09-09 | 13 | 0 | NOTICE. Per the Court's Notice of August 10, 2011 12 , Defendants were required to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint no later than September 1, 2011. Defendants have not taken any action in this case since that date. Given Defendants' failure to file an answer, the Court directs Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd to move for entry of a default pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before October 3, 2011. Failure to do so will result in the Court dismissing the case for failure to prosecute the action on October 4, 2011. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 41(a). Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 09/09/2011. (Crootof, R.) Modified on 9/12/2011 (Ghilardi, K.). Corrected the deadline month to October. (Entered: 09/09/2011) | |||
| 2011-09-15 | 14 | 0 | NOTICE of Appearance by Maura Murphy-Osborne on behalf of State of Connecticut, Secretary of State of Connecticut (Murphy-Osborne, Maura) (Entered: 09/15/2011) | |||
| 2011-09-15 | 15 | 0 | First MOTION for Leave to File E-File by State of Connecticut, Secretary of State of Connecticut. (Murphy-Osborne, Maura) (Entered: 09/15/2011) | |||
| 2011-09-15 | 16 | 0 | First MOTION for Extension of Time until 10/31/2011 To File Their Answer by State of Connecticut, Secretary of State of Connecticut. (Murphy-Osborne, Maura) (Entered: 09/15/2011) | |||
| 2011-09-15 | 17 | 0 | ORDER granting 15 Motion for Leave to E-File. All parties represented by counsel who have CM/ECF access may file pleadings and other documents electronically, and may be served electronically. Pro se parties shall continue to manually file documents and will receive service by United States mail. If pro se parties wish to receive service electronically, they must complete and return to the Clerk a Consent For Electronic Notice. If pro se parties wish to file electronically, they must complete and return to the Clerk a Motion to Participate in Electronic Filing. Both of these forms are available at www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms.html. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 9/15/2011. (Hamilton, S.) (Entered: 09/15/2011) | |||
| 2011-09-15 | 18 | 0 | ORDER granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's 1 Complaint no later than October 31, 2011. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 9/15/2011. (Hamilton, S.) (Entered: 09/15/2011) | |||
| 2011-09-16 | 19 | 0 | ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 9/15/2011. (Ghilardi, K.) (Entered: 09/16/2011) | |||
| 2011-09-21 | 20 | 0 | ORDER Returning Submission as Deficient: Motion for Entry of Default returned to Keith Russell Judd. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 9/21/11. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 09/21/2011) | |||
| 2011-09-26 | 21 | 0 | MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to Secretary of State, State of CT, MOTION to Strike 14 Notice of Appearance and 16 Motion for Extension of Time (Responses due by 10/17/2011, ) by Keith Russell Judd. (Attachments: # 1 memorandum)(Brown, S.) (Entered: 09/27/2011) | |||
| 2011-09-28 | 22 | 0 | ORDER. On September 15, 2011, Maura Murphy Osborne filed an appearance on behalf of Defendants State of Connecticut and the Secretary of Connecticut. Because she employed an "electronic signature" or "s-signature," denoted as "/s/" followed by her name, Plaintiff Keith Russel Judd has filed a Motion for Entry of Default and Motion to Strike Appearance and Defendant's Motion for an Extension of Time 21 . Although he observes that such an omission may be promptly corrected after being called to the attention of the opposing party, see Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 760 (2001), Mr. Judd believes the Court should enter default in his favor despite no evidence that Mr. Judd has previously made Ms. Osborne aware of what he perceives as her lapse. The Court does not find it necessary to rule on the admissibility of electronic signatures at this time; instead, it directs Ms. Osborne to file a replacement Notice of Appearance with a handwritten signature not later than October 6, 2011. Mr. Judd's Motion 21 is DENIED without prejudice to renewal should Ms. Osborne fail to file a replacement Notice by October 6, 2011. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 09/28/2011. (Crootof, R.) (Entered: 09/28/2011) | |||
| 2011-09-29 | 23 | 0 | NOTICE of Appearance by Maura Murphy-Osborne on behalf of State of Connecticut, Secretary of State of Connecticut (Murphy-Osborne, Maura) (Entered: 09/29/2011) | |||
| 2011-10-03 | 24 | 0 | MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Keith Russell Judd.Responses due by 10/24/2011 (Pesta, J.) (Entered: 10/04/2011) | |||
| 2011-10-03 | 25 | 0 | MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to all defendants by Keith Russell Judd. (Pesta, J.) (Entered: 10/04/2011) | 2014-03-21 17:39:50 | 9fdbb00e1bb4469f18d4df613a79e8a38fb29377 | |
| 2011-10-05 | 26 | 0 | ORDER. The Defendants entered an appearance on September 15, 2011, which the Court accepts as it prefers to decide cases on the merits. The Court granted Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to file an answer, so Defendants' answer is not due until October 31, 2011. Accordingly, Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd's Motion for Default 25 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 10/05/2011. (Crootof, R.) (Entered: 10/05/2011) | |||
| 2011-10-24 | 27 | 0 | MOTION for class action certification by Keith Russell Judd.Responses due by 11/14/2011 (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 10/26/2011) | |||
| 2011-10-28 | 28 | 0 | MOTION for Revoke IFP status Order by State of Connecticut, Secretary of State of Connecticut. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Murphy-Osborne, Maura) (Entered: 10/28/2011) | |||
| 2011-10-31 | 29 | 0 | ORDER. Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd is ordered to file a response to Defendants' Motion to Revoke IFP Status 28 on or before November 18, 2011. Deadlines for Defendants' responses to Mr. Judd's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 24 and Motion for Class Certification 27 are extended to seven days after this Court decides Defendants' Motion to Revoke IFP Status 28 . Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 10/31/2011. (Crootof, R.) (Entered: 10/31/2011) | |||
| 2011-11-14 | 30 | 0 | Plaintiff's Response in Opposition re 28 MOTION for Revoke IFP status Order. filed by Keith Russell Judd. (Ghilardi, K.) Modified on 11/15/2011 corrected file date to 11/14/2011 (Ghilardi, K.). (Entered: 11/15/2011) | |||
| 2011-11-14 | 31 | 0 | MOTION for Preliminary Injunction For Access To Law Library Books And Resources by Keith Russell Judd.Responses due by 12/5/2011 (Ghilardi, K.) (Entered: 11/15/2011) | |||
| 2011-11-14 | 32 | 0 | NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 29 Order, No Filing Fee Paid by Keith Russell Judd. (Ghilardi, K.) (Entered: 11/15/2011) | |||
| 2011-11-14 | 33 | 0 | Index to Record on Appeal by Keith Russell Judd re 32 Notice of Appeal, 18 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, 14 Notice of Appearance, 29 Order, 17 Order on Motion for Leave to File,, 20 Order Returning Submission, 12 Notice, 27 MOTION application for class action certification, 9 Response, 25 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to all defendants, 15 First MOTION for Leave to File E-File, 5 Electronic Summons Issued, 24 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 11 Summons Returned Executed, 31 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 19 Electronic Filing Order, 26 Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), 6 USM Service Info to IFP Plaintiff, 13 Notice,,, 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 1 Complaint, 21 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to Secretary of State, State of CT MOTION to Strike 14 Notice of Appearance, 28 MOTION for Revoke IFP status Order, 23 Notice of Appearance, 10 Notice (Other), 16 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 10/31/2011 To File Their Answer, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 22 Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a),, Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a),, Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a),, Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), 7 Notice (Other), 8 Notice (Other), 4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 30 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion. For docket entries without a hyperlink, contact the court to arrange for the document(s) to be made available to you. (Ghilardi, K.) (Entered: 11/15/2011) | |||
| 2011-11-16 | 34 | 0 | ORDER. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 24 ; Motion for Class Action Certification 27 ; and Motion for Preliminary Injunction For Access to Law Library Books and Resources 31 and Defendants' Motion to Revoke IFP Status Order 28 . Mr. Judd has filed a response to the Defendants' Motion; the Court has postponed the deadline for the Defendants' Response to the the Motion for Preliminary Injunction 24 and Motion for Class Action Certification 27 to seven days after this Court decides Defendants' Motion to Revoke IFP Status Order 28 . See Order 29 . The Court now extends the deadline for the Defendants' Response to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction For Access to Law Library Books and Resources 31 to seven days after this Court decides Defendants' Motion to Revoke IFP Status Order 28 as well.Mr. Judd has filed an appeal of this Court's decision not to grant his Motion for Default, see Order 26 , and its extension of time for the Defendants' Responses to Mr. Judd's other motions, see Order 29 . As the Court "retains discretion to deny... a stay... where the appeal is patently frivolous or taken for an obviously improper purpose," see Cendant Corp. v. Forbes, 72 F. Supp. 2d 341, 343 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (citing United States v. Salerno, 868 F.2d 524, 539 (2d Cir. 1989)), the Court intends to proceed with this case. Therefore, notwithstanding Mr. Judd's appeal, the Defendants are directed to file their Reply to Mr. Judd's Response to the Motion to Revoke IFP Status Order on or before November 30, 2011. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 11/16/2011. (Crootof, R.) (Entered: 11/16/2011) | |||
| 2011-11-18 | 35 | 0 | MOTION for Default Judgment as to State of CT Defendants by Keith Russell Judd. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 11/18/2011) | |||
| 2011-11-21 | 36 | 0 | Plainitff Keith Russell Judd correctly notes in his Motion for Default 35 that the Government's Answer was due on or before October 31, 2011, and as of this date, the Government has not filed an Answer. However, Mr. Judd also knows that a number of motions are currently pending before this Court, including the Government's Motion to Revoke Mr. Judd's IFP status. The Court declines to issue a finding of default while that motion is pending. Accordingly, as with the Government's responses to other pending motions, the Government's Answer deadline is postponed to seven days after this Court decides the Government's Motion to Revoke IFP Status Order 28 . Mr. Judd's Motion for Default 35 is DENIED without prejudice to renewal should the Government fail to file an Answer by the required date, should an Answer still be required at that time. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 11/21/2011. (Crootof, R.) (Entered: 11/21/2011) | |||
| 2011-11-21 | 37 | 0 | MOTION to Strike 28 MOTION for Revoke IFP status Order by Keith Russell Judd.Responses due by 12/12/2011 (Brown, S.) (Entered: 11/22/2011) | |||
| 2011-11-28 | 38 | 0 | ORDER. Plaintiff Keith Russel Judd filed a Motion to Strike Defendants' Motion to Revoke IFP Status 37 on the basis that the Government's lawyer used an electronic signature when she filed the Motion to Revoke IFP Status. The Court directs Mr. Judd to the United States District Court District of Connecticut Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures Manual, http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/cmecf/PDF%20Documents/policies_n_procedures.pdf (March 28, 2008). The Manual states: "Counsel's identification name and password shall constitute counsel's signature for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and any other purpose for which a signature is required on a document in connection with proceedings before the court.... In addition, the name of the password registrant under whose password the document is submitted should be preceded by a "/s/" or "s/" or "/s" and typed in the space where the signature would otherwise appear...."As the Government's attorney has complied with the Manual's requirement, Mr. Judd's Motion to Strike 37 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 11/28/2011. (Crootof, R.) (Entered: 11/28/2011) | |||
| 2011-11-30 | 39 | 0 | REPLY TO RESPONSE to 28 Motion to Revoke IFP Status filed by State of Connecticut, Secretary of State of Connecticut. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Murphy-Osborne, Maura) Modified on 12/1/2011 to create hyperlink (Brown, S.). (Entered: 11/30/2011) | |||
| 2011-12-08 | 40 | 0 | MOTION for Default Judgment as to State of CT and Sect'y of State of CT by Keith Russell Judd. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 12/12/2011) | |||
| 2011-12-12 | 41 | 0 | AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 38 Order on Motion to Strike by Keith Russell Judd. (Brown, S.) Modified on 12/14/2011 (Brown, S.). (Entered: 12/13/2011) | |||
| 2011-12-19 | 42 | 0 | Ruling and ORDER denying 40 Motion for Default Judgment; ; granting 28 Motion for Order; Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 12/19/2011. (Falcone, K.) Modified on 12/19/2011 to correct motions erroneously terminated(Falcone, K.). (Entered: 12/19/2011) | 2011-12-22 11:54:41 | aeff28b349e63cd41d8e8e7eb3c2c6818d3a0071 | |
| 2012-01-19 | 43 | 0 | ORDER. Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd was given until January 16, 2012 to submit a filing fee and a notice to the Court that he had paid the fee. No such fee or notice has been filed. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice, and Mr. Judd's pending motions--a Motion for Preliminary Injunction 24 ; a Motion for Class Certification 27 ; and a Motion for Preliminary Injunction 31 are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is ordered to close the case. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 1/19/2012. (Crootof, R.) (Entered: 01/19/2012) | |||
| 2012-01-19 | 44 | 0 | JUDGMENT Dismissing Case.For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms.html. Signed by Clerk on 1/19/2012. (Ghilardi, K.) (Entered: 01/19/2012) | |||
| 2012-01-30 | 45 | 0 | NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 44 Judgment Dismissing Case by Keith Russell Judd. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 02/02/2012) | |||
| 2012-02-02 | 46 | 0 | Index to Record on Appeal by Keith Russell Judd re 45 Notice of Appeal, 14 Notice of Appearance, 29 Order, 17 Order on Motion for Leave to File, 12 Notice, 27 MOTION application for class action certification, 44 Judgment, 5 Electronic Summons Issued, 24 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 6 USM Service Info to IFP Plaintiff, 13 Notice,,, 43 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, 39 Response, 1 Complaint, 21 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to Secretary of State, State of CT MOTION to Strike 14 Notice of Appearance, 38 Order on Motion to Strike, 37 MOTION to Strike 28 MOTION for Revoke IFP status Order, 42 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Order, 23 Notice of Appearance, 16 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 10/31/2011 To File Their Answer, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 8 Notice (Other), 4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 18 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, 20 Order Returning Submission, 33 Index to Record on Appeal, 9 Response, 15 First MOTION for Leave to File E-File, 25 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to all defendants, 41 Notice of Appeal, 36 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 11 Summons Returned Executed, 31 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 19 Electronic Filing Order, 35 MOTION for Default Judgment as to State of CT, 26 Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), 34 Order, 32 Notice of Appeal, 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 28 MOTION for Revoke IFP status Order, USM Service Papers Sent, 10 Notice (Other), 22 Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), 7 Notice (Other), 30 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 40 MOTION for Default Judgment as to State of CT defendant's. For docket entries without a hyperlink, contact the court to arrange for the document(s) to be made available to you. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 02/02/2012) | |||
| 2012-02-08 | 47 | 0 | MOTION to Alter or Amend Judgment by Keith Russell Judd.Responses due by 2/29/2012 (Brown, S.) (Entered: 02/08/2012) | |||
| 2012-02-09 | 48 | 0 | ORDER. As Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd did not receive this Court's December 19, 2011 Order, the Court GRANTS his Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 47 and VACATES its January 19, 2011 Oder 43 . The Clerk is instructed to reopen the case and reopen Mr. Judd's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 24 , Motion for Class Certification 27 , and Motion for Preliminary Injunction 31 .Mr. Judd has until March 5, 2012 to submit the filing fee and send a notice to this Court that he has paid the fee. If the filing fee is not paid and the notice not submitted by that date, the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice on March 6, 2012. Defendants have 30 days after the submission of the filing fee and notice to file an answer to Mr. Judd's complaint and responses to Mr. Judd's aforementioned pending motions. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 2/9/2012. (Crootof, R.) (Entered: 02/09/2012) | |||
| 2012-02-13 | 49 | 0 | MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keith Russell Judd. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 02/14/2012) | |||
| 2012-02-15 | 50 | 0 | ORDER. For the reasons described in this Court's December 19, 2011 Order 42 , Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 49 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 2/15/2012. (Crootof, R.) (Entered: 02/15/2012) | |||
| 2012-02-27 | 51 | 0 | NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 48 Order granting Motion to Alter Judgment, 42 Order denying 40 Motion for Default Judgment, by Keith Russell Judd. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 02/28/2012) | |||
| 2012-02-27 | 52 | 0 | NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 50 Order denying Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keith Russell Judd. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 02/28/2012) | |||
| 2012-02-28 | 53 | 0 | Index to Record on Appeal by Keith Russell Judd re 52 Notice of Appeal, 51 Notice of Appeal, 14 Notice of Appearance, 29 Order, 17 Order on Motion for Leave to File,, 12 Notice, 49 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 27 MOTION application for class action certification, 44 Judgment, 5 Electronic Summons Issued, 45 Notice of Appeal, 24 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 6 USM Service Info to IFP Plaintiff, 13 Notice, 43 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, 39 Response, 1 Complaint, 21 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to Secretary of State, State of CT MOTION to Strike 14 Notice of Appearance, 38 Order on Motion to Strike, 37 MOTION to Strike 28 MOTION for Revoke IFP status Order, 42 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Order, 23 Notice of Appearance, 16 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 10/31/2011 To File Their Answer, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 8 Notice (Other), 4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 18 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, 48 Order on Motion to Alter Judgment, 20 Order Returning Submission, 46 Index to Record on Appeal, 33 Index to Record on Appeal, 9 Response, 15 First MOTION for Leave to File E-File, 25 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to all defendants, 41 Notice of Appeal, 36 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 11 Summons Returned Executed, 31 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 19 Electronic Filing Order, 35 MOTION for Default Judgment as to State of CT, 26 Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), 34 Order, 32 Notice of Appeal, 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 28 MOTION for Revoke IFP status Order, 50 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, USM Service Papers Sent, 10 Notice (Other), 22 Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), 7 Notice, 47 MOTION to Alter Judgment, 30 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 40 MOTION for Default Judgment as to State of CT defendant's. For docket entries without a hyperlink, contact the court to arrange for the document(s) to be made available to you. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 02/28/2012) | |||
| 2012-03-08 | 54 | 0 | ORDER. In this Court's Order of February 9, 2012, it reopened the case at Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd's request to allow him to submit a filing fee, and gave him until March 5, 2012 to submit a fee and a notice to the Court that the fee was paid. As of today, Mr. Judd has not paid the fee. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice, and Mr. Judd's pending motions--a Motion for Preliminary Injunction 24 ; a Motion for Class Certification 27 ; and a Motion for Preliminary Injunction 31 are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is ordered to close the case. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 3/8/2012. (Crootof, R.) (Entered: 03/08/2012) | |||
| 2012-03-09 | 55 | 0 | JUDGMENT dismissing case. For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms.html. Signed by Clerk on 3/9/2012. (Ghilardi, K.) (Entered: 03/09/2012) | |||
| 2012-03-09 | 56 | 0 | MANDATE of USCA dated 3/9/12 Dismissing 32 Notice of Appeal filed by Keith Russell Judd (Brown, S.) (Main Document 56 replaced on 3/12/2012) (Brown, S.). (Entered: 03/09/2012) | |||
| 2012-03-12 | 57 | 0 | Docket Entry Correction re 56 USCA Mandate; modified to substitute pdf (Brown, S.) (Entered: 03/12/2012) | |||
| 2012-04-13 | 58 | 0 | ORDER Returning Submission as Deficient: document titled "Game Over Economics" returned to Keith Russell Judd. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 4/13/12. (Pesta, J.) (Entered: 04/13/2012) | |||
| 2012-04-27 | 59 | 0 | MANDATE of USCA dated 4/27/12 Dismissing 45 Notice of Appeal filed by Keith Russell Judd (Brown, S.) (Entered: 04/30/2012) | |||
| 2012-06-04 | 60 | 0 | MANDATE of USCA dated 6/4/1 Dismissing 52 Notice of Appeal filed by Keith Russell Judd, 51 Notice of Appeal filed by Keith Russell Judd (Brown, S.) (Entered: 06/05/2012) | 2012-10-08 15:49:59 | e240d8314ad9001db0b5f72f76d54617d994a036 | |
| 2012-08-02 | 61 | 0 | MOTION for Relief from 44 Judgment; MOTION for Order to Register All Convicted and Incarcerated Felons, and to Remove Barack Obama from State's 2012 Presidential Election Ballot by Keith Russell Judd. (Responses due by 8/23/2012, )(Brown, S.) Modified on 8/3/2012 to add text (Brown, S.). (Entered: 08/03/2012) | |||
| 2012-08-06 | 62 | 0 | ORDER. Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd has moved for relief from judgment. The Court dismissed Mr. Judd's suit because he did not pay the required filing fee, but Mr. Judd's motion does not address this issue, much less provide a valid reason for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b). Mr. Judd's 61 Motion for Relief from Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 8/6/2012. (Lake, G.) (Entered: 08/06/2012) | |||
| 2012-08-16 | 63 | 0 | ORDER denying 61 Motion to Alter Judgment. See Order dated August 6, 2012. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 8/16/2012. (Lake, G.) (Entered: 08/16/2012) | |||
| 2012-08-20 | 64 | 0 | NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 62 Order denying Motion for Relief from Judgment, by Keith Russell Judd. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 08/21/2012) | |||
| 2012-08-21 | 65 | 0 | Index to Record on Appeal by Keith Russell Judd re 59 USCA Mandate, 60 USCA Mandate, 56 USCA Mandate, 64 Notice of Appeal, 61 MOTION to Alter Judgment MOTION for to Register all Civicted and Incarcerated Felons Order, 63 Order on Motion to Alter Judgment, 62 Order on Motion for Order, Index to Record on Appeal by Keith Russell Judd re 52 Notice of Appeal, 51 Notice of Appeal, 14 Notice of Appearance, 29 Order, 17 Order on Motion for Leave to File, 12 Notice, 49 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 27 MOTION application for class action certification, 44 Judgment, 5 Electronic Summons Issued, 45 Notice of Appeal, 24 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 6 USM Service Info to IFP Plaintiff, 13 Notice, 43 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, 39 Response, 1 Complaint, 21 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to Secretary of State, State of CT MOTION to Strike 14 Notice of Appearance, 38 Order on Motion to Strike, 37 MOTION to Strike 28 MOTION for Revoke IFP status Order, 42 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Order, 23 Notice of Appearance, 16 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 10/31/2011 To File Their Answer, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 8 Notice (Other), 4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 18 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, 48 Order on Motion to Alter Judgment, 20 Order Returning Submission, 46 Index to Record on Appeal, 33 Index to Record on Appeal, 9 Response, 15 First MOTION for Leave to File E-File, 25 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to all defendants, 41 Notice of Appeal, 36 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 11 Summons Returned Executed, 31 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 19 Electronic Filing Order, 35 MOTION for Default Judgment as to State of CT, 26 Order on Motion for Default Entry 55 (a), 34 Order, 32 Notice of Appeal, 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 28 MOTION for Revoke IFP status Order, 50 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, USM Service Papers Sent, 10 Notice (Other), 22 Order on Motion for Default, Order on Motion to Strike, (a), Entry 55(a), Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a), 7 Notice, 47 MOTION to Alter Judgment, 30 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 40 MOTION for Default Judgment as to State of CT defendant's. For docket entries without a hyperlink, contact the court to arrange for the document(s) to be made available to you. (Brown, S.) (Brown, S.) (Entered: 08/21/2012) | |||
| 2013-01-24 | 66 | 0 | MANDATE of USCA dated 1/24/2013 Dismissing 64 Notice of Appeal filed by Keith Russell Judd (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 01/24/2013) |